QAF: Frame Semantics-based Question Interpretation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Natural language questions are interpreted to a sequence of patterns to be matched with instances of patterns in a knowledge base (KB) for answering. A natural language (NL) question answering (QA) system utilizes meaningful patterns matching the syntactic/lexical features between the NL questions and KB. In the most of KBs, there are only binary relations in triple form to represent relation between two entities or entity and a value using the domain specific ontology. However, the binary relation representation is not enough to cover complex information in questions, and the ontology vocabulary sometimes does not cover the lexical meaning in questions. Complex meaning needs a knowledge representation to link the binary relation-type triples in KB. In this paper, we propose a frame semantics-based semantic parsing approach as KB-independent question pre-processing. We will propose requirements of question interpretation in the KBQA perspective, and a query form representation based on our proposed format QAF (Question Answering with the Frame Semantics), which is supposed to cover the requirements. In QAF, frame semantics roles as a model to represent complex information in questions and to disambiguate the lexical meaning in questions to match with the ontology vocabulary. Our system takes a question as an input and outputs QAF-query by the process which assigns semantic information in the question to its corresponding frame semantic structure using the semantic parsing rules.
منابع مشابه
Application of Frame Semantics to Teaching Seeing and Hearing Vocabulary to Iranian EFL Learners
A term in one language rarely has an absolute synonymous meaning in the same language; besides, it rarely has an equivalent meaning in an L2. English synonyms of seeing and hearing are particularly grammatically and semantically different. Frame semantics is a good tool for discovering differences between synonymous words in L2 and differences between supposed L1 and L2 equivalents. Vocabulary ...
متن کاملSession 9: Natural Language Processings
Traditional approaches to interpretation in natural language processing typically fall into one of three classes: syntaxdriven, semantics-driven, or frame/task based. Syntaxdriven approaches use a domain-independent grammar to drive the interpretation process and produce a global parse of the input, accounting for each word of the sentence. Semantics-driven approaches use knowledge about the ca...
متن کاملA New Interpretation of the Semantics of "Moral Obligation" from Allame Tabatabaie's Viewpoint
The most important part in analyzing moral concepts includes those used as predicate in moral sentences covering moral concepts of valuation and obligation. Moral concepts in the field of values include those like “good” and “bad” while obligatory concepts include “ought to” and “ought no” and “duty”. Many papers have been written about “moral obligation”; however, dissociating the area of sema...
متن کاملQuantitative fundus autofluorescence in healthy eyes.
PURPOSE Fundus autofluorescence was quantified (qAF) in subjects with healthy retinae using a standardized approach. The objective was to establish normative data and identify factors that influence the accumulation of RPE lipofuscin and/or modulate the observed AF signal in fundus images. METHODS AF images were acquired from 277 healthy subjects (age range: 5-60 years) by employing a Spectra...
متن کاملDenotational Semantics for "Natural" Language Question-Answering Programs
Scott-Strachey style denotational semantics is proposed as a suitable means of communicating the specification of "natural" language question answerers to computer programmers and software engineers. The method is exemplified by a simple question answerer communicating with a small data base. This example is partly based on treatment of fragments of English by Montague. Emphasis is placed on th...
متن کامل